There is just no way to graciously inform someone their food made you puke.

So this has been my week. My boyfriend returned from the States with a little sometime extra in his carry-on bag: the dreaded man-flu! Given a couple of days in our healthy British climate, it promptly mutated into woman-flu and infected me. So we’ve both been off work feeling rather sorry for ourselves.

My first day home sick, I was feeling bad, but Luke was feeling terrible…and we were out of milk. And basically any other food item in the house besides Remy’s dog food—and while that, bizarrely, looks like minestrone stew (there are pasta spirals in it?), neither of us was particularly interested in kibble. So as the slightly-less-lurgified person, I headed out to get Lucozade, orange juice, morphine, and everything else a flu-stricken household needs. (Definitely morphine.) While I was out, I picked up a prepared salad at a store that I won’t name because I do actually really like them; it meant I wouldn’t have to prepare anything for lunch, and it was a grated carrot salad with some hummus and falafel on top, which seemed vitamin-C-y and generally good for convalescing. I got home and promptly munched away, and it was really nice. I even remember thinking “This really is a simple meal—I should make this for myself again sometime.”

Then…I started feeling funny. Then I started feeling more funny, and then I started feeling NOT FUNNY AT ALL, which culminated in me laying on the bathroom floor for about forty minutes (hilariously, Remy followed me upstairs and was like “oh, we’re laying down now? OH COOL I’M GOOD AT THAT” and fell asleep on the bathmat) and finally throwing up absolutely everything in my stomach. Keep in mind that I’m already sick—coughing, itchy throat, stuffed-up head—so it was basically an orgy of unremitting misery. I then insisted that we order pizza for dinner, because obviously eating things that are good for me was a terrible mistake.

I told my mother about it, because I was completely trolling for sympathy am a good daughter, and her response was “Have you called the store and told them? Someone with a compromised immune system could get very ill.” I made noises about doing it later, and then re-told the whole story to my sister, because I am a good sister was shamelessly trolling for sympathy, and she said the same thing. Then she said apparently food poisoning is one of the most under-reported problems out there, because people go home, are unpleasantly ill, and then basically want to forget it happened, so the restaurant or shop is never informed and they continue serving something that’s making people sick. So basically, by not telling the shop in question, I’m potentially killing little old ladies and harming the bottom line of a store who was never given a chance to fix things. Balls.

So I phoned them, and while the guy I spoke to was perfectly pleasant (well, as pleasant as one can be while discussing the intricacies of vomit), it was still one of the more skin-crawlingly awkward phone conversations I’ve ever had. How on earth do you handle it? I went for the “my social awkwardness is your social awkwardness” approach, and opened with “Um, I feel really silly calling to tell you this, but…” and then explicitly made it about whether they were still selling the same batch of salad, so it wouldn’t sound like I was laying the foundation for a lawsuit. (I’m American. People expect me to be fluent in Litigious.)

It goes without saying that I hope I never find myself in this situation again, but if I do…how on earth do you handle it? Just accept that it’s going to be awkward? Phone while still in the throes of misery, so my awkwardness will be overwhelmed by my desire to find someone to blame? (“Yooouuuu! YOU MADE THIS SALAD! I HATE YOU!!!!!”) Hope that a niche stationer out there has a card for just this occasion? Actually, maybe that’s a gap in the market I should attempt to fill…between that, greeting cards for fellow commuters you feel obligated to recognise but don’t actually want to be friends with, and “Three beers ago you seemed like a good idea, but let’s never speak again,” I could make a killing.

Haters Puffin

Puffins gonna puff…

The internet ruins everything.

Okay, maybe not everything. The internet has vastly improved my ability to caption cat pictures, for example. But lately I’ve noticed a new way people react to disagreement that makes me want to kill it with fire (sorry, it’s a post about the internet: memes ahoy, kids): constant references to “haters.”

I do get it. If you have a popular blog, or a blog whose readership extends beyond your immediate family and friends, or a blog that a random fourteen-year-old stumbles upon while attempting to read All The Internets, you probably get the odd trolling comment that is purely about saying shitty things to you. But it seems like more and more often, any disagreement on the internet—no matter how nuanced or carefully expressed, no matter how much it’s intended as a discussion-starter rather than an insult—gets classified by the person being disagreed with as about HATERS, don’t haters just suck?, haters REALLY GET ME DOWN  *snap*. And it’s so annoying. It’s the internet equivalent of responding to any criticism with “whatever, you don’t know me, you’re just jealous.” Except on the internet you’re writing it on your blog, not while standing on the Maury Povich stage, so you don’t have those external cues to point out that you just might be the one in the wrong here.

Don’t worry, this isn’t a veiled reference to any blog in particular; it’s just something I’ve noticed becoming more and more common. Maybe it’s just the next stage in adjusting to the internet—when I was a teenager it was about Perverts In Chatrooms, a few years ago it was about “maybe if you plan on doing things like applying for a job or attempting to appear professional anytime in the future, you should stop putting pictures of yourself doing drugs as your profile pic on Facebook,” now it’s THE MEDIA IS RUINING INTELLIGENT DISCOURSE, go-round #5,772. But at the moment, it’s becoming a real drag on my blogroll, and hey, this is my blog, so I get to say what I want, I do what I want, YOU’RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME!! *neckroll*

Oh, and yes: extra credit to anyone who comments on this post with “no fatties” or an ascii drawing of a penis.

So over the weekend, there’s been a series of duelling interviews/press releases/etc over Natalie Portman’s performance in Black Swan, and how much of her character’s dancing was her versus how much was performed by Sarah Lane, her dance double. A Jezebel article points out that the timing of the whole thing is a little weird and pointless—Portman’s already won the Golden Globe and Oscar, and the movie is a success. Lane’s revelation, whether it’s believed or not, isn’t going to make that much of a difference to the movie’s bottom line. So…why does it matter?

The obvious explanation is that if Portman wasn’t doing most of her own dancing, the performance somehow suffers—it wasn’t a full portrayal of a ballerina having a mental breakdown. And I guess there’s an argument to be made there; the climactic moments of the film happen onstage, and if we know it’s Portman’s face superimposed on Lane’s body, maybe that would lessen the impact for some people.

The thing is, though, that climactic moment also involves Portman sprouting wings. That scene is not about the reality of her dancing; it’s about seeing what her character feels—and given that we’re already well, well into CGI territory, I’m not sure why having someone else do the footwork matters. Also, and I say this as a girl who took about ten years of dance lessons, ballet is really fucking difficult. Mind-blowingly so. It’s not just being able to spin or kick really high, it’s about performing feats of balance even for moves that look totally basic, and having a certain stance that we as audience members take for granted but is actually the result of years of practice, and about just generally being aware of your own body and its movements in a way lay people (and I’m including myself in this number—I took lessons as a decided amateur) don’t understand. Even if Portman just learned to hold herself like a dancer and move well enough to allow a professional dancer to be superimposed in, I’d consider that an impressive achievement.

So why the insistence (complete with percentage breakdowns! I’m expecting a pie chart press release any minute now) on Portman having transformed herself in eighteen months into something dancers work their entire lives towards? I can’t help but wonder whether it’s because such an overwhelming amount of the discussion of her performance has been about her physical transformation: how skinny she was, how she lived on coffee and worked out eight hours a day, just look at her tiny dancer’s body! If we agree she looked that way because she turned herself into a ballet dancer, then it’s a triumph of immersive acting. If it turns out she did all that just to be able to look like a dancer, though, then we’ve all been lauding an actress for being really really good at dieting.

Don’t get me wrong: I think Portman is a fantastic actress, and I think her performance in Black Swan is about much, much more than what she looked like. But I think a lot of the critical discussion of her performance has devolved into talking about her looks, and if we take the artistic merit of her dancing out of it, that discussion starts to look a whole lot like rewarding an actress purely for hitting extreme physical ideals. I’d argue certain people aren’t insisting on Portman’s dancing for Portman’s sake; they’re arguing their point because of what it says about themselves.

 

Oh, bangs. Or fringe, if you’re British, but ‘fringe’ is one of those terms that my mind resolutely refuses to assimilate, years after ‘flat’ and ‘mobile’ and ‘wanker’ have become regular features of my vocabulary. Anyway: BANGS. I have had them for two or three years now, and I really liked them. I wear my hair down a lot, and bangs are kind of a cheaty way to give my hair a definite style without any effort on my part. Within the last month or so, though, I found myself, evening after evening, standing in front of the mirror with a toothbrush sticking out of my mouth, holding my bangs off of my face, considering…I’m not sure what changed, but it feels like I went to bed one evening thinking “gosh, look at my lovely face-framing bangs!” and woke up to “MY GOD WHY DOES MY HAIR MAKE MY FACE LOOK LIKE A HORRIBLE CUBE.”

 

So I am trying to grow them out. I haven’t had to grow bangs out since I was about eleven (at which point, by the by, I basically had this exact same haircut, it’s the ciiiiircle of life). And if you’ve never tried it, allow me to enlighten you: it is basically the most infuriating thing on the planet. My mother keeps giving me the same advice that everyone gives, which is to get some cute barrettes or bobby pins and just clip them out of the way. The problem is, since I am quite early on in the process, pinning my bangs to the side means the bobby pins start at the center of my hairline. The look is rather…spiky. At the moment, I am resorting to copious amounts of hairspray and doing a sort of brushed-to-the-side thing to try to avoid the horrible “bangs covering my eyebrows completely” look. It doesn’t look THAT different from my old hairstyle, to be honest (there’s just a little wedge of visible forehead on one side), but the intention is there, by god. The one saving grace is that I am unemployed at the moment—if I had to go to work, at a workplace, with peeeeeeople, with my horrible shaggy mop I would totally have caved by now and trimmed them–so it’s basically my boyfriend and my dog who are around to give me the side-eye. And one of them never wears pants, so it’s not like he gets to judge me for my personal appearance issues.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.